une attaque sur des bases iraniènnes n'est parait-il qu'une question de temps...

le moyen orient est sur le point de s'embraser..

le petrole qui n'est pas manipulable comme dit maitre Dupilon anticipe en partie ce conflit et les acteurs sur place ont fait leur préparatifs

reste à esperer que les plans belliqueux des faucons ne se réalisent pas car l'embrasement de cette region auraient des ondes de chocs un peu partout au monde

http://contreinfo.info/article.php3?id_article=1964

http://contreinfo.info/article.php3?id_article=1961

Da ,Iran maybe the next war !

Les articles ne manquent pas dans la Blogosphere

www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/10962352/iran_the_next_war

Certains  parlent de laisser une chance à la bombe atomique Israelienne - 2000km , le nuage Tchernobyle a mieux fait en distance

www.normalverkehr.com/post/historiker-morris-letzte-chance-ist-eine-israelische-atombombe/

D'autre laisse parler Ron Paul , en parlant de son groupe "les Republicains"

""Passant en revue les exposés présentés par notre groupe, j'ai noté avec une certaine préoccupation , qu'ils semblent plus axés sur l'avenir à  justifier une attaque contre l'Iran que de l'information sur les progrès en Iraq», a dit R Paul.

Vidéo Staff on the American free Press RON PAUL

scatattack.wordpress.com/2008/05/12/general-waves-white-flag-after-ron%E2%80%99s-grilling/

ou encore :

CIA ‘preparing public for Iran war’
His comments come at a time when a recent CBS report indicates that the US Defense Department had ordered military commanders to develop new war plans against Tehran, a claim echoed by top American analysts. ...Infowars - http://www.infowars.com

Même si il s'agissait d'une frappe chirurgicale sur un abris sous terrain à l'aide d'une bombe perforante ... imaginez les represailles terroristes sur le monde occidentalisé.

"J'ignore quelle seront les armes de la troisième guerre mondiale, mais je suis sûr que celles de la quatrième guerre mondiale seront des frondes et des cailloux." Einstein

JERUSALEM (Reuters) - The United States and Israel agree on the need for "tangible action" to prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons, Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert's spokesman said after a visit by U.S. President George W. Bush.

"We are on the same page. We both see the threat ... And we both understand that tangible action is required to prevent the Iranians from moving forward on a nuclear weapon," Olmert spokesman Mark Regev said on Friday.

Regev described diplomatic efforts so far to exert pressure on Iran as "positive", but added: "It is clearly not sufficient and it's clear that additional steps will have to be taken".

Asked about the option of using military force, Regev said: "Leaders of many countries have talked about many options being on the table and, of course, Israel agrees with that."

Bush ratcheted up his rhetoric toward Tehran in a speech to Israel's Knesset on Thursday, saying critics' calls for talks with Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad were comparable to the "appeasement" of Adolf Hitler before World War Two.

Bush vowed that Washington would stand with Israel in opposing Iran's nuclear ambitions, saying it would be "unforgivable" if Tehran were allowed to get the bomb.

Iran has said it will not stop uranium enrichment, which it says is for generating electricity only. In a separate development on Friday, the United States said it would sign an agreement with Saudi Arabia to help the kingdom develop peaceful nuclear energy.

(Reporting by Adam Entous; Editing by Mark Trevelyan)

http://www.reuters.com/article/topNews/idUSL1669745620080516?feedType=RSS&feedName=topNews

 La Maison Blanche nie le rapport Isrellien que GW Bush entend attaquer l'Iran avant la fin de son mandat .

Jerusalem Post

White House denies Iran attack report
Jerusalem Post Staff , THE JERUSALEM POST May. 20, 2008

The White House on Tuesday flatly denied an Army Radio report that claimed US President George W. Bush intends to attack Iran before the end of his term. It said that while the military option had not been taken off the table, the administration preferred to resolve concerns about Iran's push for a nuclear weapon "through peaceful diplomatic means."

Army Radio had quoted a top official in Jerusalem claiming that a senior member in the entourage of President Bush, who visited Israel last week, had said in a closed meeting here that Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney were of the opinion that military action against Iran was called for.

The official reportedly went on to say that, for the time being, "the hesitancy of Defense Secretary Robert Gates and Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice" was preventing the administration from deciding to launch such an attack on the Islamic Republic.

The Army Radio report, which was quoted by The Jerusalem Post and resonated widely, stated that according to assessments in Israel, the recent turmoil in Lebanon, where Hizbullah has established de facto control of the country, was advancing an American attack.

Bush, the official reportedly said, considered Hizbullah's show of strength evidence of Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's growing influence. In Bush's view, the official said, "the disease must be treated - not its symptoms."

However, the White House on Tuesday afternoon dismissed the story. In a statement, it said that "[the US] remain[s] opposed to Iran's ambitions to obtain a nuclear weapon. To that end, we are working to bring tough diplomatic and economic pressure on the Iranians to get them to change their behavior and to halt their uranium enrichment program."

It went on: "As the president has said, no president of the United States should ever take options off the table, but our preference and our actions for dealing with this matter remain through peaceful diplomatic means. Nothing has changed in that regard."

In an interview last week in the Oval Office, Bush told the Post that "Iran is an incredibly negative influence" and "the biggest long-term threat to peace in the Middle East," but that the US was "pushing back hard and will continue to do so."

He noted that "Iran is involved in funding Hamas and Hizbullah, and it's that Iranian influence which I'm deeply concerned about. But there needs to be more than just the United States concerned about it."

Bush said: "We take [seriously] this issue of [Iran] getting the technology, the know-how on how to develop a nuclear weapon."

"All options are on the table," he said, but, "Of course you want to try to solve this problem diplomatically."

Asked whether the Iranians would be deterred from their nuclear drive by the time he left office, Bush told the Post: "What definitely will be done [before I leave office will be the establishment of] a structure on how to deal with this, to try to resolve this diplomatically. In other words sanctions, pressures, financial pressures. You know, a history of pressure that will serve as a framework to make sure other countries are involved."

Days later, in his address to the Knesset, Bush said that "the president of Iran dreams of returning the Middle East to the Middle Ages" and "America stands with you in firmly opposing Iran's nuclear weapons ambitions."

"Permitting the world's leading sponsor of terror to possess the world's deadliest weapon would be an unforgivable betrayal of future generations. For the sake of peace, the world must not allow Iran to have a nuclear weapon," he said.

le pouvoir des mollahs en serait que renforcé face à l'opinion publique , je pense que le gouvernement iranien veut une guerre ! mais on z vu ce que cela donnait en Irak

Affligeant

(RTTNews) - Iran's President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said on Monday that Israel will disappear from the world map soon and that the "satanic power" of the United States faced destruction, reported Iran's IRNA news agency.

"You should know that the criminal and terrorist Zionist regime which has 60 years of plundering, aggression and crimes in its file has reached the end of its work and will soon disappear off the geographical scene," IRNA quoted Ahmadinejad as saying on Monday.

"The bell on the countdown of the destruction of the empire of power and wealth has begun to ring," Ahmadinejad added, referring to the US.

According to the IRNA report President Ahmadinejad made the remarks at a ceremony honoring the late founder of the Islamic Republic of Iran, Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini.

Ahmadinejad has been very vocal in his criticisms of Israel and the US and had stirred up an international controversy in 2005 after calling to "wipe Israel off the map."

Later on Monday, the White House responded to the Iranian president's remarks by saying that such comments will only serve in isolating the Iranian people further.

"It's that kind of rhetoric that just serves to further isolate the Iranian people," White House spokeswoman Dana Perino said. "We'll let him go on and be bombastic if he wants, and ignore him."

Les rumeurs continuent et sont réguliérement alimentées un peu partout de par le monde..... Cette fois, il s' agit des déclarations de  Joshka Fischer......

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/babylonbeyond/2008/05/iran-former-ger.html

By Reuters
Reuters
| 06 Jun 2008 | 08:48 AM ET

Oil rose by more than $3 a barrel to above $131 on Friday, bringing gains in the last two days to $9 as the dollar weakened further on a jump in the jobless rate in the United States.

Comments from Israel's transport minister that an attack on Iranian nuclear sites looked "unavoidable" given the apparent failure of sanctions to deny Tehran technology with bomb-making potential also helped drive prices higher.

This was the most explicit threat yet against Iran from Prime Minister Ehud Olmert's government.

U.S. light, sweet crude for July delivery was up.

Oil surged $6 in after-hours trading on Thursday in the U.S., erasing two days of sharp losses triggered by worries that high oil prices were starting to dent demand.

Crude hit a record high of $135 last month.

London Brent crude rose.

The remarks from the Israeli government gave added momentum to the rally, said Olivier Jakob of analysts Petromatrix.

"Financial money is flowing back into oil and commodities," said Jakob.

"When the market is in such a strong rally, there is a tendency to read the bullish headlines rather than the bearish ones."

The dollar weakened further against the euro on Friday, having fallen by more than 1 percent on Thursday after European Central Bank President Jean-Claude Trichet said a number of policymakers wanted higher interest rates and a hike was possible as soon as next month.

Investors have used oil and other commodities as a hedge against the weaker dollar and inflation as the housing crisis and high fuel prices batter the U.S. economy.

Demand

The sharp reversal in the dollar put longer-term worries about weakening oil demand on the backburner, after they were rekindled earlier this week when India and Malaysia decided to raise domestic fuel prices to cope with bulging subsidy bills.

The International Energy Agency (IEA), an adviser to 27 industrialized countries, issues its latest forecasts next week and has said it may lower its 2008 demand growth projection further, after having already more than halved it to 1.03 million barrels per day (bpd).

But some analysts say subsidy cuts in Asia will not be enough to slow oil use.

"World oil demand growth is still accounted mostly by China, the Middle East and Latin America -- and through the summer, there is no reason to expect a material slowdown in demand growth in these areas," said Harry Tchilinguirian, oil analyst at BNP Paribas in London.

Ahead of a weekend meeting of G8 energy ministers plus their peers from China, India and South Korea, to try and agree on the role of consumer nations in stemming oil's five-year price rally, the IEA warned that oil demand would rise by 70 percent if governments continued with current policies.

It also urged world governments to start a $45 trillion dollar "energy technology revolution" or risk a 130 percent surge in carbon emissions by 2050.

SAINT-PÉTERSBOURG, 7 juin - RIA Novosti. Les essais de la centrale nucléaire iranienne de Bouchehr, construite par la Russie, doivent débuter en automne prochain, a déclaré samedi à Saint-Pétersbourg le PDG du groupe nucléaire russe Rosatom, Sergueï Kirienko.

"Il ne fait aucun doute que la centrale sera lancée. Nous sommes actuellement en phase finale des travaux, et nous passerons bientôt au démarrage", a-t-il déclaré à la presse en marge du Forum économique international de Saint-Pétersbourg.

"Les tests réels de la centrale, avec le combustible nucléaire, doivent débuter en automne prochain", a-t-il précisé, insistant sur la sécurité du stockage des matières nucléaires.

En 1995, la Russie et l'Iran ont signé un contrat portant sur l'achèvement des travaux de construction, entamés par l'Allemagne, de la première pile de la centrale nucléaire iranienne de Bouchehr. Moscou a également promis de livrer un réacteur VVER-1000, de l'alimenter en combustible nucléaire et de former des spécialistes iraniens. Le chantier devait initialement prendre fin le 8 juillet 1999, mais la mise en service du site a été reportée à maintes reprises.

Le 16 décembre 2007, la Russie a lancé les livraisons de combustible nucléaire pour le réacteur de Bouchehr. Huit lots de combustible, d'environ 11 tonnes chacun, ont été envoyés en Iran en deux mois. Le combustible nucléaire est généralement livré à la centrale six mois avant son démarrage.

Tout se passe comme prévu.

Apres l'invitation de Bachar pour le 14 juillet et l'annonce de discussions Syrie-Israel sur le Golan de manière à couper le Hezbollah de ses sources de ravitaillement voici la "révélation" de " l'essai à blanc" du bombardement de l'Iran ....

c'est bizarre mais l 'Analyse dynamique predit comme par hasard une hausse énorme du pétrole alors que les marchés dévissent  ....

bizarre, vous avez dit bizarre ?

Pas de confirmation ni démenti israélien après une information du New York Times sur la préparation d'un raid sur l'Iran

Israel pourrait attaquer l'Iran ? Rappelez vous il y deux ans. Tsahal s'est cassé les dents contre le hesbollah au Liban. Pour Tsahal, ce fut un échec dans les airs et un échec sur terre. Ce n'est plus l'armée invicible du début de l'état d'Israel. Et les autres en face d'eux le savent. Attaquer l'Iran ? Peut etre, si les Israéliens sont suicidaires, mais ils ne le sont pas. 

En tant qu'investisseur, nous devons penser en termes de probabilités. Les états majors pensent également en termes de probabilités. Et ici la probabilité est énorme qu'une attaque causerait un very big bordel pour Israel.  

http://www.voltairenet.org/article143328.html

http://www.guysen.com/articles.php?sid=6546

 http://www.huyghe.fr/actu_238.htm

------------------------------------------------------------------

 l'AT semble montrer que la vraie hausse du petrole n'a pas commencé :

http://atdmfcahen.over-blog.com/

et lorsqu'on se souvient de la réaction de Chavez qui a menacé il y a quelques jours de ne plus vendre son pétrole pour une simple affaire de clandestins en Europe .....

imaginez le cours du pétrole si son pote Amadin reçoit un missile sur la tête ....

Tout se met en place ....